Defending Imperial Nudity, Paul Krugman
From: t r u t h o u tBy Paul Krugman
The New York Times
Friday 04 November 2005
Hans Christian Andersen understood bad rulers. "The Emperor's New Suit" doesn't end with everyone acclaiming the little boy for telling the truth. It ends with the emperor and his officials refusing to admit their mistake.
I've laid my hands on additional material, which Andersen failed to publish, describing what happened after the imperial procession was over.
The talk-show host Bill O'Reilly yelled, "Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!" at the little boy. Calling the boy a nut, he threatened to go to the boy's house and "surprise" him.
Fox News repeatedly played up possible finds of imperial clothing, then buried reports discrediting these stories. Months after the naked procession, a poll found that many of those getting most of their news from Fox believed that the emperor had in fact been clothed.
Imperial officials eventually admitted that they couldn't find any evidence that the suit ever existed, or that there had even been an effort to produce a suit. They insisted, however, that they had found evidence of wardrobe-manufacturing-and-distribution-related program activities.
After the naked procession, pro-wardrobe pundits denied that the emperor was at fault. The blame, they said, rested with the C.I.A., which had provided the emperor with bad intelligence about the potential for a suit.
Read rest of this article
posted by Annamarie at
1:31 PM
1 comment(s):
best regards, nice info coverage insurance viagra Cp hydrocodone what is tramadol Renault ersatzteilkatalog Amnesia global transient xenical http://www.guidelines-best-practices-for-letterhead-stationery.info/120_tramadol_free.html Cadillac realty companies tramadol maryland state tax return status Faxless checkless payday loans Replace a hard drive http://www.buy-tramadol-9.info/Tramadol.html Well fargo consolidation loan
By
Anonymous, at
10:51 PM
Post a comment
<< Home